If we could demonstrate the existence of God, everything would eventually be subjected to the sovereignty of man.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 290
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Nicolás Gómez Dávila (“Don Colacho”) in his library
English translations of the aphorisms of Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Nicolás Gómez Dávila (“Don Colacho”) in his library
About
Who was Nicolás Gómez Dávila?
What did Nicolás Gómez Dávila think about...?
- God & Religion
- Gnosticism
- Politics, Law & Society
- Democracy & Equality
- Liberty & Liberties
- Reaction & the Reactionary
- Progress & Progressives
- Revolutions & Revolutionaries
- Marx & Marxists
- The Bourgeoisie & Capitalism
- Technique & Technology
- Intelligence & Wisdom (& Stupidity)
- Problems & Solutions
- Philosophy
- Hierarchical Axiology
- History & Historiography
- Arts & Letters
- Virtue & Vice
- Love & Sensuality
- Taste, Manners, Sentiments
- The Art of Writing
- Index
Links
Epigraphs
“Quel fanatisme!” exclama le pharmacien, en se penchant vers le notaire.
(Gustave Flaubert, Madame Bovary, Part 2, Chapter 8)
¡Oh! Pues si no me entienden--respondió Sancho—no es maravilla que mis sentencias sean tenidas por disparates.
(Cervantes, Don Quixote, Part 2, Chapter 19)
ὀλιγόστιχα μέν, δυνάμεως δὲ μεστὰ.
(Diogenes Laërtius, Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, Book VII, Life of Herillus)
A hand, a foot, a leg, a head,
Stood for the whole to be imaginèd.
(Shakespeare, The Rape of Lucrece, ll. 1427-8)
Aux meilleurs esprits
Que d'erreurs promises!
Ni vu ni connu,
Le temps d'un sein nu
Entre deux chemises!
(Paul Valéry, Le Sylphe)
Daß es sich hier um die lange Logik einer ganz bestimmten philosophischen Sensibilität handelt und nicht um ein Durcheinander von hundert beliebigen Paradoxien und Heterodoxien, ich glaube, davon ist auch meinen wohlwollendsten Lesern nichts aufgegangen.
(Nietzsche, Letter to Georg Brandes, 8 January 1888)
Et miraris quod paucis placeo cui cum paucis convenit, cui omnia fere aliter videntur ac vulgo, a quo semper quod longissime abest id penitus rectum iter censeo.
(Petrarch, Epistolae de Rebus Familiaribus, Book XIX, Letter 7)
For a translation and explanation of these epigraphs, click here.
(Gustave Flaubert, Madame Bovary, Part 2, Chapter 8)
¡Oh! Pues si no me entienden--respondió Sancho—no es maravilla que mis sentencias sean tenidas por disparates.
(Cervantes, Don Quixote, Part 2, Chapter 19)
ὀλιγόστιχα μέν, δυνάμεως δὲ μεστὰ.
(Diogenes Laërtius, Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, Book VII, Life of Herillus)
A hand, a foot, a leg, a head,
Stood for the whole to be imaginèd.
(Shakespeare, The Rape of Lucrece, ll. 1427-8)
Aux meilleurs esprits
Que d'erreurs promises!
Ni vu ni connu,
Le temps d'un sein nu
Entre deux chemises!
(Paul Valéry, Le Sylphe)
Daß es sich hier um die lange Logik einer ganz bestimmten philosophischen Sensibilität handelt und nicht um ein Durcheinander von hundert beliebigen Paradoxien und Heterodoxien, ich glaube, davon ist auch meinen wohlwollendsten Lesern nichts aufgegangen.
(Nietzsche, Letter to Georg Brandes, 8 January 1888)
Et miraris quod paucis placeo cui cum paucis convenit, cui omnia fere aliter videntur ac vulgo, a quo semper quod longissime abest id penitus rectum iter censeo.
(Petrarch, Epistolae de Rebus Familiaribus, Book XIX, Letter 7)
For a translation and explanation of these epigraphs, click here.
I have to add here that I highly doubt this aphorism can be construed to be compatible with (what I understand to be) established Catholic teaching that the existence of God is not merely a matter of faith, but can indeed be known by man.
ReplyDeleteThis is perhaps the clearest example of what I have characterized elsewhere as the "fideistic trend in Gómez Dávila's thought."
OTOH:
ReplyDelete"The philosopher does not demonstrate; he shows.
He says nothing to someone who does not see."
Timon,
ReplyDeleteYou're probably correct to read those two aphorisms together, but I'm still uneasy about this one, at least the way it is formulated.
The original Spanish is:
ReplyDeleteSi pudiéramos demostrar la existencia de Dios, todo se habría sometido al fin a la soberanía del hombre.