The pure reactionary is not a dreamer of abolished pasts, but a hunter of sacred shades on the eternal hills.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 324
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Nicolás Gómez Dávila (“Don Colacho”) in his library
English translations of the aphorisms of Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Nicolás Gómez Dávila (“Don Colacho”) in his library
About
Who was Nicolás Gómez Dávila?
What did Nicolás Gómez Dávila think about...?
- God & Religion
- Gnosticism
- Politics, Law & Society
- Democracy & Equality
- Liberty & Liberties
- Reaction & the Reactionary
- Progress & Progressives
- Revolutions & Revolutionaries
- Marx & Marxists
- The Bourgeoisie & Capitalism
- Technique & Technology
- Intelligence & Wisdom (& Stupidity)
- Problems & Solutions
- Philosophy
- Hierarchical Axiology
- History & Historiography
- Arts & Letters
- Virtue & Vice
- Love & Sensuality
- Taste, Manners, Sentiments
- The Art of Writing
- Index
Links
Epigraphs
“Quel fanatisme!” exclama le pharmacien, en se penchant vers le notaire.
(Gustave Flaubert, Madame Bovary, Part 2, Chapter 8)
¡Oh! Pues si no me entienden--respondió Sancho—no es maravilla que mis sentencias sean tenidas por disparates.
(Cervantes, Don Quixote, Part 2, Chapter 19)
ὀλιγόστιχα μέν, δυνάμεως δὲ μεστὰ.
(Diogenes Laërtius, Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, Book VII, Life of Herillus)
A hand, a foot, a leg, a head,
Stood for the whole to be imaginèd.
(Shakespeare, The Rape of Lucrece, ll. 1427-8)
Aux meilleurs esprits
Que d'erreurs promises!
Ni vu ni connu,
Le temps d'un sein nu
Entre deux chemises!
(Paul Valéry, Le Sylphe)
Daß es sich hier um die lange Logik einer ganz bestimmten philosophischen Sensibilität handelt und nicht um ein Durcheinander von hundert beliebigen Paradoxien und Heterodoxien, ich glaube, davon ist auch meinen wohlwollendsten Lesern nichts aufgegangen.
(Nietzsche, Letter to Georg Brandes, 8 January 1888)
Et miraris quod paucis placeo cui cum paucis convenit, cui omnia fere aliter videntur ac vulgo, a quo semper quod longissime abest id penitus rectum iter censeo.
(Petrarch, Epistolae de Rebus Familiaribus, Book XIX, Letter 7)
For a translation and explanation of these epigraphs, click here.
(Gustave Flaubert, Madame Bovary, Part 2, Chapter 8)
¡Oh! Pues si no me entienden--respondió Sancho—no es maravilla que mis sentencias sean tenidas por disparates.
(Cervantes, Don Quixote, Part 2, Chapter 19)
ὀλιγόστιχα μέν, δυνάμεως δὲ μεστὰ.
(Diogenes Laërtius, Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, Book VII, Life of Herillus)
A hand, a foot, a leg, a head,
Stood for the whole to be imaginèd.
(Shakespeare, The Rape of Lucrece, ll. 1427-8)
Aux meilleurs esprits
Que d'erreurs promises!
Ni vu ni connu,
Le temps d'un sein nu
Entre deux chemises!
(Paul Valéry, Le Sylphe)
Daß es sich hier um die lange Logik einer ganz bestimmten philosophischen Sensibilität handelt und nicht um ein Durcheinander von hundert beliebigen Paradoxien und Heterodoxien, ich glaube, davon ist auch meinen wohlwollendsten Lesern nichts aufgegangen.
(Nietzsche, Letter to Georg Brandes, 8 January 1888)
Et miraris quod paucis placeo cui cum paucis convenit, cui omnia fere aliter videntur ac vulgo, a quo semper quod longissime abest id penitus rectum iter censeo.
(Petrarch, Epistolae de Rebus Familiaribus, Book XIX, Letter 7)
For a translation and explanation of these epigraphs, click here.
The original Spanish is:
ReplyDeleteEl reaccionario neto no es soñador de pasados abolidos, sino cazador de sombras sagradas sobre las colinas eternas.
This aphorism is very similar to the last line of "El reaccionario auténtico," an essay published in 1995, one year after Gómez Dávila's death. Here is the last line in Spanish:
ReplyDeleteEl reaccionario no es el soñador nostálgico de pasados abolidos, sino el cazador de sombras sagradas sobre las colinas eternas.
RV Young's translation of this line from the end of "The Authentic Reactionary" is:
"The reactionary is not a nostalgic dreamer of a canceled past, but rather a hunter of sacred shades upon the eternal hills."
This aphorism (#1,994) was originally published in 1986 in the first volume of Nuevos Escolios, while "The Authentic Reactionary" was only published after Gómez Dávila's death. However, I am not sure whether Gómez Dávila wrote the aphorism first and later incorporated it into an essay which he left behind at his death, or whether he wrote the essay first and then used it as material for his aphorisms.