The so highly acclaimed “dominion of man over nature” turned out to be merely an enormous capability to kill.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 474
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
March 17, 2011
March 16, 2011
#2,963
That the abandonment of the “what for” in the sciences has been productive is indisputable, but it is an admission of defeat.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 473
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 473
March 9, 2011
#2,919
Why deceive ourselves? Science has not answered a single important question.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 466
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 466
March 5, 2011
#2,895
It is fine to demand that the imbecile respect arts, letters, philosophy, the sciences, but let him respect them in silence.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 463
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 463
March 4, 2011
#2,892
The principle of inertia and the notion of natural selection eliminated the necessity of attributing meaning to facts, but they did not demonstrate that meaning does not exist.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 463
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 463
February 26, 2011
#2,856
The limits of science are revealed with greater clarity by the waxing light of its triumphs.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 457
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 457
February 16, 2011
#2,796
The social sciences are not, properly speaking, inexact sciences, but sciences of the inexact.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 448
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 448
February 4, 2011
#2,723
Stupidity appropriates what science invents with diabolical facility.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 438
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 438
January 20, 2011
#2,629
Nothing makes clearer the limits of science than the scientist’s opinions about any topic that is not strictly related to his profession.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 424
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 424
January 18, 2011
#2,618
Each one of a science’s successive orthodoxies appears to be the definitive truth to the disciple.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 423
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 423
January 11, 2011
January 5, 2011
January 2, 2011
#2,522
As it is unable to explain that consciousness which creates it, science, when it finishes explaining everything, will not have explained anything.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 405
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 405
January 1, 2011
December 4, 2010
#2,353
The sciences tend to become bureaucratic, just like everything else.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 381
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 381
November 7, 2010
#2,187
Whoever has understood a notion from the natural sciences has understood all that can be understood; whoever has understood a notion from the humanities has understood only what he can understand.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 356
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 356
November 2, 2010
#2,160
Whoever appeals to any science in order to justify his basic convictions inspires distrust of his honesty or his intelligence.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 352
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 352
October 23, 2010
#2,101
The sciences, particularly the social sciences, are depositing successive strata of barbarisms on top of literature.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 340
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 340
October 7, 2010
#2,004
The professional never admits that in the science he practices insignificant truths abound.
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 326
Escolios a un Texto Implícito: Selección, p. 326
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)